251![47 South Dakota South Dakota tied for 47th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, dropping one spot compared to 47 South Dakota South Dakota tied for 47th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, dropping one spot compared to](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/70eddd0b79987ca638460775ef1b09d0.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:53
|
---|
252![39 Kansas Kansas tied for 39th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, rising six spots compared to 2012 and earning a 39 Kansas Kansas tied for 39th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, rising six spots compared to 2012 and earning a](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/591488db1dd9cb95068b32437e668b92.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:09
|
---|
253![12 Michigan Michigan tied for 12th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, the same position it held in[removed]The state 12 Michigan Michigan tied for 12th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, the same position it held in[removed]The state](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/5b4ad451fbff1d9ed955f0f7a29f464c.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:18
|
---|
254![33 Nevada Nevada tied for 33rd in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, dropping two spots compared to 33 Nevada Nevada tied for 33rd in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, dropping two spots compared to](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/b9d8f98a737da382e6df2891f5d42ee1.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:36
|
---|
255![44 Louisiana Louisiana tied for 44th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, a slight drop compared to[removed]Thought the 44 Louisiana Louisiana tied for 44th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, a slight drop compared to[removed]Thought the](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/360e16cb1833a23e529368a1718c4bd1.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:11
|
---|
256![12 New Jersey New Jersey tied for 12th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, rising four spots compared to 2012. 12 New Jersey New Jersey tied for 12th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, rising four spots compared to 2012.](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/2bb3a5281fef450faa11b1ba5790fed3.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:39
|
---|
257![[removed]Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 154 [removed]Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 154](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/fae654c2d62bfb6a2ee0b3d43b9d0bad.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.gpo.govLanguage: English - Date: 2013-05-23 12:13:41
|
---|
258![24 Utah Utah tied for 24th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, dropping three positions compared to 24 Utah Utah tied for 24th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, dropping three positions compared to](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/403dc6ba8c36426b1e0e839b97dcda75.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:55
|
---|
259![39 Kentucky Kentucky tied for 39th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, dropping three spots compared 39 Kentucky Kentucky tied for 39th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, dropping three spots compared](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/32f5d7512ab21b9ad415271132ef3752.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:11
|
---|
260![22 Delaware Delaware ranked 22nd in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, rising five spots compared to 22 Delaware Delaware ranked 22nd in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, rising five spots compared to](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/53db9a28017226507ef51d911f8ca635.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:00:59
|
---|